Dual TO: names in Mailwatch

Chris Trudeau chris at TRUDEAU.ORG
Mon Nov 10 21:27:00 GMT 2003


Steve,
I added these lines in my MailWatch.pm as outlined below:

<SNIP>
use DBI;
use Sys::Hostname;

my($dbh);
my($sth);
my($hostname) = hostname;
my(%rcpts);
map { $rcpts{$_}=1; } @{$message->{to}};
@{$message->{to}} = keys %rcpts;

# Modify this as necessary for your configuration
my($db_name) = "mailscanner";
</SNIP>


Restarted processes.  no errors in SQL logging, but still receiving
duplicates...

This isn't exactly a pristine environment though...let me re-build my test
box and try it there...I'll let you know.

THX
CT



----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at LBSLTD.CO.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch


> Hi Julian,
>
> I had to change:
>
> $message->{to} = keys %rcpts;
>  to
> @{$message->{to}} = keys %rcpts;
>
> Otherwise $message->{to} was always blank - seems to work okay with
> Sendmail, just need someone to test it with Postfix.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Field
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Sent: 11/10/03 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
>
> Steve,
>
> Can this be done easily in MailWatch by doing something like this very
> early on with the message?
>
> my(%rcpts);
> map { $rcpts{$_}=1; } @{$message->{to}};
> $message->{to} = keys %rcpts;
>
> That would remove any duplicate "to" addresses from the message object.
> Try putting the above 3 lines of code right near the start of the
> MailWatch
> code.
>
> At 15:25 10/11/2003, you wrote:
> >I tried to respond off list to Julian, but my mail was returned.
> >
> >I've been begging for this for months and would entertain the idea of
> paying
> >someone (anyone) to escalate the priority of this problem...
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >CT
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> >Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:03 AM
> >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> >
> >
> > > It's a known MailScanner bug. I just haven't got around to fixing it
> yet,
> > > it's not exactly high priority at the moment.
> > >
> > > At 13:59 10/11/2003, you wrote:
> > > >Hi Pete,
> > > >
> > > >This is a MailScanner or Postfix issue as MailWatch only uses
> information
> > > >from MailScanner's $message object which is populated by
> MailScanner
> > > >parseing the Postfix message file.
> > > >
> > > >You'll also find the same problem of duplicated 'To' entries in the
> admin
> > > >notices as reported by someone else.
> > > >
> > > >The postcat command didn't really give me much to go on at all
> (thought
> >it'd
> > > >be better than that) - so I'll have a Google around and see if I
> can find
> > > >any info about the file spec for Postfix and see if I can find the
> >problem.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Steve.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Pete russell <pete at EATATHOME.COM.AU>
> > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > >Sent: Mon Nov 10 13:47:28 2003
> > > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > >
> > > >Funny, this happened ona %100 fresh install of mailscanner and
> fedora
> > > >and MW .4 - my previous post was regarding my existing MW .3
> machines.
> > > >
> > > >If you do find a fault I can repair myself, please le tme know as I
> > > >would like to fix the .3 install on the production servers - cos I
> wont
> > > >be moving to .4 just yet.
> > > >
> > > >thanks
> > > >Pete
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]
> On
> > > >Behalf Of Steve Freegard
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:37 AM
> > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > >
> > > >Hi Pete,
> > > >
> > > >Can you stop the outbound queue runner temporarily to stop the
> messages
> > > >that
> > > >have been processed by MailScanner from being delievered, then run
> the
> > > >'postcat' command across one of the messages and post the output to
> the
> > > >list.
> > > >
> > > >Kind regards,
> > > >Steve.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Pete russell <pete at EATATHOME.COM.AU>
> > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > >Sent: Mon Nov 10 08:38:36 2003
> > > >Subject: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > >
> > > >I have the latest version of mailwatch, mailscanner, postfix, mysql
> and
> > > >RH9 - in the TO: column, when looking at recent messages, all the
> names
> > > >are listed twice - this also makes the Top Recipients by Volume
> graph
> > > >unreadable as the legend has 2 entries for each person. Doesn't
> seem
> > > >like we are getting 2 deliveries though, and doesn't seem like
> anything
> > > >is written twice to the maillog.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Pete
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
> they
> > > >are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> notify
> > > >the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
> > > >
> > > >This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> by
> > > >MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer
> viruses.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
> they
> > > >are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> notify
> > > >the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
> > > >
> > > >This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> by
> > > >MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer
> viruses.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Julian Field
> > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > >
> > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>
> --
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer viruses.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list