Spam notice

[ian douglas]

Problem with digests, as experienced in the past with web hosting and
setting up Email mailing lists, is that HTML Emails cause a lot of
headaches. The digest mode would have to strip HTML or save it as
text/plain - otherwise badly-written HTML could make an archive really hard
to read, if readable at all, embedded styles, etc., could make even the
prettiest HTML documents look horrendous.

Just my $0.02 worth, but yes, I support this idea. I have one user (who gets
50% of all spam collected on my system of dozens of domains hosted) who is
particularly paranoid about FP's and losing legit Email.

-id

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
> Behalf Of John Wilcock
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:36 AM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Spam notice
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:11:02 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> > maybe a real-time notice for spam and a daily digest for high-scoring?
>
> How about
>
> | Spam Actions = store notice
> | High Scoring Spam Actions = store digest
>
> or
>
> | Spam Actions = store daily-digest
> | High Scoring Spam Actions = store weekly-digest
>
> or something along similar lines, true to Julian's usual everything is
> configurable habits...
>
> For that matter, a digest of viruses might be interesting too,
> particularly as a way to inform users about all the silent viruses
> they've received (or rather that they haven't received, if you see
> what I mean).
>
> John.
>
> --
> -- Over 2000 webcams from ski resorts around the world - www.snoweye.com
> -- Translate your technical documents and web pages    - www.tradoc.fr
>