mike at CAMAROSS.NET
Wed Nov 5 15:22:02 GMT 2003
I think you are correct
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:17 AM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Odd behaviour
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
> > [mailto:michele at BLACKNIGHTSOLUTIONS.COM]
> > Envoyé : Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:10 AM À :
> > MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK Objet : Re: Odd behaviour
> > We had a similar problem recently. It seemed to right
> itself after a
> > couple of hours though.
> > Are the load averages high?
> > > I've recently seen something that I cannot recall seeing
> > before. Seems
> > > like MailScanner spots messages in mqueue.in but only
> scans a few of
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Nov 5 15:47:24 MS01 MailScanner: New Batch: Found
> > 26 messages
> > > waiting
> > > Nov 5 15:47:24 MS01 MailScanner: New Batch:
> > Scanning 2 messages,
> > > 1014386 bytes
> > >
> > > This happens repeatedly. The queues move but are seldom
> > totally emptied.
> > >
> > > Anyone else seen this?
> Isn't it because MailScanner distributes the messages between
> its process (example, there are 20 messages waiting in queue,
> process 1 takes 12 and the other takes 8)?
More information about the MailScanner