Kevin.Spicer at BMRB.CO.UK
Fri May 30 09:30:37 IST 2003
The answer lies in the spam score header which will tell you which tests were 'hits'. A spam score of 3.8 seems a bit low - you should probably expect quite a few false positives at that setting.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apostolus [mailto:apostolus at BLUEYONDER.CO.UK]
> Sent: 30 May 2003 09:15
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: lycos
> Hi Group
> ANYONE KNOW WHY AN EMAIL FROM name.surname at lycos.co.uk would
> be treated as
> spam? seems a bit strange to me..
> running mailscanner with spamassassin and f-prot..
> i've set a spam score of 3.8 on incoming mail
> $Id: check_mailscanner,v 18.104.22.168 2003/03/26 22:38:28
> thanks all
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> Mailscanner thanks Transtec Computers for their support.
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately. Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited. BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
More information about the MailScanner