Tuning MailScanner

[Derek Winkler]

Don't we all.

Multiple MX records.

I use one of my MS/SA servers as the master and rsync my configs to the
others.

I'd be interested to know if anyone has tried consolidating or using one
server as master for Bayes/SA db files.

Would it be as simple as rsync'ing the bayes_path directory?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sevy [mailto:tsevy at EPX.COM]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 5:25 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Tuning MailScanner


Has anyone attempted or succeeded in implementing a load balanced or HA

cluster of SA servers?

-----Original Message-----

From: mikea [mailto:mikea at MIKEA.ATH.CX]

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 5:10 PM

To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Subject: Re: Tuning MailScanner



On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:

> I was reading the thread on running MailScanner with lower numbers of

> children and/or reducing the number of messages/batch to be scanned.

> However, I'm not sure I ever saw a concensus on what is best.

>

> It sounded like it was dependend on the number of messages being received.

> If there weren't enough messages coming in to load all the instances of

> MailScanner and only the first couple grabbed all the messages then it was

> a waste running the other instances.

>

> On the other hand, reducing the number of messages/batch would distribute

> the mail load across all instances of MailScanner and would be more

> efficient.

>

> If this is correct then the trick is to spread the mail load across as

> many instances of MailScanner as possible as long as you don't run out of

> server resources ie cpu load and memory.

>

> Sendmail is very efficient. The real problems are the virus/spam scanning

> especially the RBL checking.

>

> Is the above correct?

That's pretty much my take on it.

Of course, tuning, even within those very broad guidelines, will be

very much a matter of tweaking one thing at a time, hoping that it

was the right thing, and wondering how much of the apparent change

comes from the tweaked parameter and how much from changes in the

characteristics of the processed mail.

I've been doing much the same thing with mainframe operating systems

since 1977, and it's still a black art. I used to have a black robe

with start, moons, etc., on it, which I reserved for working on really

bad problems, but my management disapproved. By the time I became

management, the robe was gone. *sigh*

--

Mike Andrews

mikea at mikea.ath.cx

Tired old sysadmin since 1964
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20030523/922b14fd/attachment.html