spam score for each test in header
m.sapsed at BANGOR.AC.UK
Thu May 15 17:40:12 IST 2003
Julian Field wrote:
> Very good idea. No sooner said than done :-)
> X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=7.8, required 5,
> DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 0.21, DRASTIC_REDUCED 1.54, HOME_EMPLOYMENT
> INVALID_DATE 0.57, INVALID_MSGID 0.38, NO_REAL_NAME 0.73,
> ONCE_IN_LIFETIME 0.74, REMOVE_SUBJ 0.81, UNDISC_RECIPS 1.44)
> Does that look okay to you?
Brilliant - top man! I thought I'd seen someone ask for that a while
back and been told it was too tricky - obviously something different.
> I would like to keep the original sort order (alphabetical) to make the
> code simpler.
I suppose we could let you off with that - everyone agreed? ;-)
> I'll release something later this evening if you like. It will make it to
> the stable release at the start of June.
Don't know how you do all this and a support job in a Uni which is
doubtless as understaffed as our's!
Information Services "Who do you say I am?"
University of Wales, Bangor Jesus of Nazareth
More information about the MailScanner