OT Regarding SA rpm vs compile with MS

[David While]

I have used the RPMs of SA without any problem. I just recently upgraded
to SA 2.53 using the RPMs.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
David While
Technical Development Manager
Faculty of Computing, Information & English
University of Central England
Tel: 0121 331 6211




"Anders Andersson, IT" <andersan at LTKALMAR.SE>
Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
07/05/2003 11:55
Please respond to MailScanner mailing list


        To:     MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
        cc:
        Subject:        OT Regarding SA rpm vs compile with MS


Hi
First and last big thanks to Julian for a superb produkt  :)

I know there been discussion not to use the rpm of SA with mailscanner.
Since Im not a great unix admin im just wondered if this has to do with ms
config files or that SA change where the rpm will be installed. It wont be
a
big prob to compile SA but Im worried how to upgrade it if I cant use rpm?
Ive tried csv once and broke the hole comp so Im a little worried since
this
is production servers!

Any hints or future solutions for the possibillity to use the rpm instead?

Kind regards

/Anders


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20030507/af903ec0/attachment.html