Qmail Support Revisited?

[Julian Field]

This may no longer be true, of course, be my reasons have always been
a) enabling any useful feature involved patching the source,
b) a message could only have 1 recipient. Bit of a problem with a site that
uses mailing lists.

At 20:53 02/05/2003, you wrote:
>Just curious... Why do you hate Qmail?
>I wouldn't have considered it, but everyone I talk to keeps singing it's
>praises.
>I value your input, so maybe you can help offset the lovey-dovey stuff I
>hear from local IT guys and other colleagues.
>
>Nathan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:55 AM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: Qmail Support Revisited?
>
>
>At 16:22 01/05/2003, you wrote:
> >Just curious if Qmail support is on the list of future enhancements?
>
>It's possible, but I still hate qmail.
>
> >We're may move some of our mail services to Qmail and don't want to
>lose
> >our beloved MailScanner. We may be willing to pay for the
>implementation
> >if I can get the powers that be to loosen the purse strings. Not an
> >immediate need, just curious what the word is now.
>
>Try asking Mariano if he fancies doing it for some money, he and a
>colleague implemented the ZMailer support and so he knows exactly what
>needs to be done.
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support