Bug in filename rules handling?

[Julian Field]

At 12:17 11/03/2003, you wrote:
>:)
>
>Indeed in 4.14-1 the problem is fixed now, I get the warnings as they
>should.

Can someone else confirm that this version is working okay, then I'll put
it up on the main web site.


>The other minor bug is still there tho. I have set Warning Is Attachment =
>no in my MailScanner.conf and still this warning is an attachment.

That's down to incorrect handling in email apps.

>Nothing serious but my users get scared if there's any vague report of
>viruses and will not open any attachment, even the VirusWarning.txt :)

I'll take a look at this when I get time, it's not a major problem.


>Thanks for fixing the problem!
>
>Remco
>
>
>On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Julian Field wrote:
>
> > I'm not having a good day, am I? :)
> >
> > Yes, I meant the 4.14-1 URLs.
> >
> > At 11:38 11/03/2003, you wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > > > In the process of adding all the code to support proper checking of
> > > > long/evil filenames, I screwed up.
> > > >
> > > > Please can you download and try out version 4.14-1, and let me know
> how you
> > > > get on.
> > > > URL's are
> > > >
> > > > Tar distribution:
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/tar/MailScanner-4.13-3.tar
> > >
> > >I guess you mean:
> > >
> > >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/tar/MailScanner-4.14
> -1.tar
> > >
> > > > RedHat (and others) RPM:
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/rpm/MailScanner-4.13-3.rpm.tar
> > >
> > >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/rpm/MailScanner-4.14
> -1.rpm.tar
> > >
> > > > SuSE:
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/suse/MailScanner-4.13-3.suse.tar
> > >
> > >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/suse/MailScanner-4.1
> 4-1.suse.tar
> > >
> > >Bye,
> > >Raymond.
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field
> > www.MailScanner.info
> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support