Port 25

[Steve Douglas]

Thank you everyone!!  I have sendmail working now.

SD
:-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Douglas [mailto:steve.douglas at SBIINCORPORATED.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:53 AM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Port 25
>
> Did you try this remote or on the box itself ? See you mail comming in
> > at all in the log ?
> I do not see any mail coming in within the mail log.
>
> SD
> :-)
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Douglas [mailto:steve.douglas at SBIINCORPORATED.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:48 AM
> > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: Re: Port 25
> >
> > >Is sendmail accepting mail ?
> > No it isn't when I send it something remotely.
> >
> > >(do a telnet tp port 25 for example) So you see any incomming entrys in
> > >your maillog ?  I am unable to telnet remotely to the box via port 25.
> >
> > When I perform the "netstat -a | grep smtp" I receive
> > tcp  0  0 localhost.localdom:smtp *:*   LISTEN
> >
> > When I enter "iptables --list" I receive
> >         Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> >         target     prot opt source               destination
> >
> >         Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> >         target     prot opt source               destination
> >
> >         Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> >         target     prot opt source               destination
> > SD
> > :-)
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at PROLOCATION.NET]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:41 AM
> > > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > Subject: Re: Port 25
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > When I did this I received the following:
> > > >
> > > > 220 xxx.localhost.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.8/8.12.8; Wed, 25 Jun 2003
> > > > 08:35:36 -050
> > > > 0
> > >
> > > Did you try this remote or on the box itself ? See you mail comming in
> > at
> > > all in the log ?
> > >
> > > Please answer all of the questions of the original reply, only
> answering
> > > half wont help most of the time :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond.