f-prot's new mailbox licensing model

[Mike Watson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:33 am, you wrote:
> Julian gave you his non-objective opinion.  Here is my opinion:
> I am running Redhat 7.2 with the latest version of Mailscanner, and
> spammassassin 2.54 and f-prot 3.13
>
> My original setup of spamassassin with procmail took me about 2 hours
> to get working.  On top of that, I had to spend time tweaking
> procmail and sendmail for whitelisting and blacklisting.  I would say
> total time was 4 hours.
>
> It took me 15 minutes to get MS+spamassassin+f-prot up and running,
> including the time needed to tweak the config files.
>
> Even if virus-scanning were done elsewhere, what would it hurt to use
> a setup like this with ClamAV instead of f-prot?  "Free" and "Open
> Source" are beautiful things.
>
> Evert Ford
> General-Purpose Computer Guy
> Westone Laboratories
>

For one, F-Prot clean, disinfects, or quarantines emails with virus when
found.  All ClamAV does is report it.

Mike W

- --
Registered Linux - 256979
NRA Life
ARS: W0TMW








-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+5nV+5fq6h2uDDlQRAkFEAJ9x+dn2YAPJQTQ0/Dhct/n7q6vyvwCgigyC
PyT+fZ0iQfQ3okj+ZBsA8+k=
=8af9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by F-Prot and MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.