I don't think Apam a susbect

[Steve Douglas]

Thank you, Tim.  The system is only under testing.  The only thing I have
difficulty with prior to going into production is a series of tests for my
own confidence.  I do appreciate your feed back.  Have a good weekend!

SD
:-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bishop [mailto:tim-lists at BISHNET.NET]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 AM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: I don't think Apam a susbect
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:53:55AM -0500, Steve Douglas wrote:
> > I have sent numerous test spam messages through my MailScanner server.
> I am
> > a newbie.  I thought I had it, but the below is consistant.
> >
> > Can anyone interpret the below content from my syslogd?  I don't think
> > SpamAssassin isn't working.  FYI: my platform is redhat 9.
> >
> > Thank you!
> > ___________________________________________________
> > June  6 02:43:18 hprh MailScanner[8131]: MailScanner
> > E-Mail Virus Scanner version 4.21-9 starting...
> > Jun  6 02:43:19 hprh MailScanner[8131]: Enabling
> > SpamAssassin auto-whitelist functionality...
> > Jun  6 02:43:19 hprh MailScanner[8131]: Using locktype
> > = flock
> > Jun  6 02:43:28 hprh MailScanner[8132]: MailScanner
> > E-Mail Virus Scanner version 4.21-9 starting...
> > Jun  6 02:43:29 hprh MailScanner[8132]: Enabling
> > SpamAssassin auto-whitelist functionality...
> > Jun  6 02:43:29 hprh MailScanner[8132]: Using locktype
> > = flock
>
> This looks like "normal" behaviour to me.
>
> Tim.
>
> --
> Tim Bishop
> http://www.bishnet.net/tim
> PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984