SV: SV: SV: Regarding rules for more then one person

[Julian Field]

At 13:37 31/07/2003, you wrote:
>One more stupid question..... will this patch work on all rules?

Yes.


>Forgot to say "thanks for all the help"
>
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
> > Skickat: den 30 juli 2003 19:50
> > Till: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Regarding rules for more then one person
> >
> >
> > Attached is a diff to Config.pm that implements this.
> > You can now have rules that look like this:
> >
> > To:     /etc/MailScanner/rules/techies.txt      yes
> >
> > Note that it has to be a full path which starts with "/" and ends in
> > something other than "/". The rule will be replicated for all
> > the patterns
> > in the techies.txt file, so you could put this in techies.txt
> >
> > # This is the list of all our tech support staff.
> > jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk *@techies.soton.ac.uk
> > jkf@*
> > /etc/MailScanner/rules/nested-filename.txt
> >
> > Note that the file format is like this:
> > 1) One pattern or address per line. The allowable patterns
> > are the same as
> > the normal patterns in any normal ruleset file.
> > 2) Comments start with # and continue until the end of the line.
> > 3) Blank lines are ignored.
> > 4) Leading and trailing white space is ignored.
> > 5) Further filenames can be included, allowing you to nest
> > these files if
> > you really need to.
> > 6) If you make a loop by having a file include itself, then
> > you're silly
> > and shouldn't do it.
> >
> > At 17:49 30/07/2003, you wrote:
> > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > > Från: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at PROLOCATION.NET]
> > > > Skickat: den 30 juli 2003 18:46
> > > > Till: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > > Ämne: Re: SV: Regarding rules for more then one person
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > > Whats the use, if you can generate a techies.txt you can also
> > > > > > generate a script that spits out a rulefile to do this ? or ?
> > > >
> > > > > Guess so but since Im not that a great I thought that
> > being able
> > > > > to use a writing all my co-workers for each rule would be
> > > > easier..... and
> > > > > if I need I only need to change in one place. Maybe Im
> > just lazy
> > > > > or bad at scripting of problems for me. Since the only ppl
> > > > that would be
> > > > > added are tech-ppl at use a single file with user for more
> > > > rules like
> > > > > filname/filetype.
> > > >
> > > > Ask one of those <haha> :)
> > >
> > >Now your being evil  ;)
> > >Im trying to learn this but prolly never get the hang of it and Im
> > >pretty sure Im not the only person in the world that sucks at
> > >scripting. So if its not to difficult I want it on the wish list  :)
> >

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support