OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access
Andrew M. Hoying
andrewh at CQG.COM
Wed Jan 8 16:01:50 GMT 2003
I implemented this and a few other things in a script and now we are
blocking 80% of incoming spam without having to bother MailScanner or
SpamAssassin with processing it.
Spam Caught / Total Incoming E-mail:
444 / 3103
High Scoring Spam:177
Spam blocked by sendmail:1748
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben C. O. Grimm [mailto:mailscanner-sub at WIREHUB.NET]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access
>
>
> On 7 Jan 2003 00:50:03 +0100, Stewart Lawler
> <slawler at SYDNEY.NII.COM.AU>
> wrote:
>
> > this looks like a great solution - but what is the
> performance impact?
> > The relay machine i'm running mailscanner on at the moment
> is rather old
> > and might not cope with being given much more to do. :-)
>
> The only performance impact will be hashing the database when
> using the
> full list. Shouldn't be too much work though. You don't have
> to worry about
> the size of the resulting db; hash lookups are blazingly fast. Our
> access.db is >20 MB in size (we put a lot of extra
> information in it), and
> it gets called at least 2 times per second. I sleep well.
>
> --
> - Ben C. O. Grimm ----------------- Ben.Grimm at wirehub.net -
> - Wirehub! Internet Engineering - http://www.wirehub.net/ -
> - Private Ponderings ----------- http://www.bengrimm.net/ -
> - Wirehub! Internet ----------- part of easynet Group plc -
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list