OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access

Andrew M. Hoying andrewh at CQG.COM
Wed Jan 8 16:01:50 GMT 2003


I implemented this and a few other things in a script and now we are
blocking 80%  of incoming spam without having to bother MailScanner or
SpamAssassin with processing it.

Spam Caught / Total Incoming E-mail:
444 / 3103
High Scoring Spam:177
Spam blocked by sendmail:1748

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben C. O. Grimm [mailto:mailscanner-sub at WIREHUB.NET] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access
> 
> 
> On 7 Jan 2003 00:50:03 +0100, Stewart Lawler 
> <slawler at SYDNEY.NII.COM.AU>
> wrote:
> 
> > this looks like a great solution - but what is the 
> performance impact?
> > The relay machine i'm running mailscanner on at the moment 
> is rather old
> > and might not cope with being given much more to do. :-)
> 
> The only performance impact will be hashing the database when 
> using the
> full list. Shouldn't be too much work though. You don't have 
> to worry about
> the size of the resulting db; hash lookups are blazingly fast. Our
> access.db is >20 MB in size (we put a lot of extra 
> information in it), and
> it gets called at least 2 times per second. I sleep well.
> 
> --
> - Ben C. O. Grimm ----------------- Ben.Grimm at wirehub.net -
> - Wirehub! Internet Engineering - http://www.wirehub.net/ -
> - Private Ponderings ----------- http://www.bengrimm.net/ -
> - Wirehub! Internet ----------- part of easynet Group plc -
> 




More information about the MailScanner mailing list