SpamAssassin 2.50 Problems
mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sun Feb 23 12:38:12 GMT 2003
I wonder if the problem is actually caused by the "make test" phase? What
happens if you reboot before starting using SA2.50 with MailScanner?
If not, then it sounds like a parallel threads problem in SA2.50. Hopefully
this will get caught by the SA guys fairly quickly, as it affects the "make
test" of spamd as well.
At 07:38 23/02/2003, you wrote:
>On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 23:25 US/Pacific, Gerry Doris wrote:
>>I upgraded from SA 2.44 to 2.50 tonight and have had nothing but
>>MailScanner hits nearly 100% CPU utilization and just sits there until
>>I've had to go back to using SA 2.44 and everything is back to normal.
>>anyone else seeing this?
>I was just installing 2.50 via "perl -MCPAN -e shell", and during the
>"t/spamd_parallel" test, the load, network, and CPU utilization went
>through the roof (it was specifically stuck at test 14/20). I suspect
>that it's somewhere in spamd that's the problem (and may only be
>something that comes up once, as someone else suggested). As soon as
>that test was over (and it took a LONG time), everything went back to
>I'll have to wait and see if it keeps up. I hope not, as I've been
>waiting for 2.50 for a while.
>(I'm cc'ing sa-talk on this, in case they have any other insights)
>System notes: freebsd 4.2, dual p2-350, 128k ram, and in case it
>matters it's on a 58k link to the net. Mailscanner version is 4.12-2.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
More information about the MailScanner