SpamAssassin 2.50 Problems

[Julian Field]

I wonder if the problem is actually caused by the "make test" phase? What
happens if you reboot before starting using SA2.50 with MailScanner?

If not, then it sounds like a parallel threads problem in SA2.50. Hopefully
this will get caught by the SA guys fairly quickly, as it affects the "make
test" of spamd as well.

At 07:38 23/02/2003, you wrote:
>On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 23:25 US/Pacific, Gerry Doris wrote:
>
>>I upgraded from SA 2.44 to 2.50 tonight and have had nothing but
>>problems.
>>MailScanner hits nearly 100% CPU utilization and just sits there until
>>SA
>>is killed.
>>
>>I've had to go back to using SA 2.44 and everything is back to normal.
>>  Is
>>anyone else seeing this?
>
>
>I was just installing 2.50 via "perl -MCPAN -e shell", and during the
>"t/spamd_parallel" test, the load, network, and CPU utilization went
>through the roof (it was specifically stuck at test 14/20).  I suspect
>that it's somewhere in spamd that's the problem (and may only be
>something that comes up once, as someone else suggested).  As soon as
>that test was over (and it took a LONG time), everything went back to
>normal.
>
>I'll have to wait and see if it keeps up.  I hope not, as I've been
>waiting for 2.50 for a while.
>
>(I'm cc'ing sa-talk on this, in case they have any other insights)
>
>System notes: freebsd 4.2, dual p2-350, 128k ram, and in case it
>matters it's on a 58k link to the net.  Mailscanner version is 4.12-2.
>
>
>John

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support