FYI: new f-prot available (3.12d)

[Julian Field]

You haven't got the original posting have you? I can't find it and
securityfocus.com appears to be unreachable from here.

If it involves clever things on the command-line, then I suspect that
MailScanner is not vulnerable anyway due to its own internal protection
mechanisms but I can't say for sure without the full vulnerability report.
F-Prot's site doesn't give a link to the original posting which is a shame.

At 06:16 22/02/2003, you wrote:
>I didn't see any mention of this previousally.  And this version fixes a
>vulnerability reported on the vuln-dev list for commandline scanners of
>f-prot on linux and FreeBSD [1].
>
>I don't see any thing else this update changes/fixes.
>
>Linux:
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb-3.12d.tar.gz
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb-3.12d.tar.gz.md5
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb_3.12d-1_i386.deb
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb_3.12d-1_i386.deb.md5
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb-3.12d-1.i386.rpm
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/fp-linux-sb-3.12d-1.i386.rpm.md5
>
>BSD:
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/bsd/fp-freebsd-sb-3.12d.tar.gz
>ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/bsd/fp-freebsd-sb-3.12d.tar.gz.md5
>
>[1] - http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/fplinux_vuln.html
>
>--
>Matthew Davis
>http://dogpound.vnet.net/
>
>Time wounds all heels...

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support