Spamassassin 2.50 & SQL logging
mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Feb 21 16:55:22 GMT 2003
At 16:29 21/02/2003, you wrote:
>Oh dear! I knew I'd get a big backlash for that comment!
>I spend 99% of
>my time dealing with MS Windows products
That's the problem, you see. I spend too much of my time with MS Windows
products, too. Things like MailScanner just look after themselves and don't
occupy my (admin) time.
>It's simply a case of user friendliness. I have no experience of the
Nor have I! I'm getting a couple of new machines shortly and will try it
out on one of them.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
>To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:17 PM
>Subject: Re: Spamassassin 2.50 & SQL logging
>At 16:00 21/02/2003, you wrote:
> >I don't think MailScanner can replace MailSweeper. At the end of the day,
> >it is not as flexible (unless you're highly skilled in linux/sendmail etc).
>Okay, what can MailSweeper do that MailScanner cannot? (ignoring MTA issues
>as that is just a matter of setting up Exim which is pretty easy). I would
>like to know, so that I can think about any extra facilities that the
>commercial guys have that I haven't.
>I freely admit it doesn't have the pretty user-interface, but that's why
>people have written things like the Webmin module for it, and
>MailScanner-MRTG for monitoring it.
> >I have MailSweeper and MailScanner and I use a linux box to do the
> >MailScanner/SpamAssassin stuff.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at LBSLTD.CO.UK>
> >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:06 PM
> >Subject: Spamassassin 2.50 & SQL logging
> >I'm evaluating MailScanner + SA 2.50/DCC/Razor2 on RedHat 7.3 for use at my
> >company in place of MIMEsweeper that we use at the moment
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
More information about the MailScanner