Spam.whitelist.rules file question
Quentin Campbell
Q.G.Campbell at NEWCASTLE.AC.UK
Thu Feb 6 10:40:10 GMT 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
> Sent: 30 January 2003 12:28
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Spam.whitelist.rules file question
>
>
> At 12:21 30/01/2003, you wrote:
> >So you are saying that he needed to put 194.205.110.133
> instead or in
> >addition to?
>
> Instead.
>
> Normally the thing in the rule is (a pattern matching) the
> email address. But if it doesn't contain any letters, it
> interprets it as (a pattern
> matching) the IP address.
>
Julian
Is the ~MailScanner/etc/rules/EXAMPLES file correct?
In its "Spam WhiteList" examples it gives:
From: 123.234. yes
From: /^192\.168\.6[4567]/ yes
Assuming the first line specifies a Class B address range then that
pattern
should allow for 123.234.xxx.xxx addresses to be whitelisted.
If the second line specifies a Class C address range then that pattern
should allow for 192.168.64.xxx addresses (say) but as there is no
terminating "." would that pattern work as expected? That is, I think it
should read:
From: /^192\.168\.6[4567]\./ yes
Quentin
---
PHONE: +44 191 222 8209 Computing Service, University of Newcastle
FAX: +44 191 222 8765 Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 7RU.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Any opinion expressed above is mine. The University can get its own."
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list