ANNOUNCE: Beta 4.23-8 released

[Alan Fiebig]

Yes, 'Other' would be the best choice to control the sending of notices.

Sometime giving it its own subject tag, sender notice, and receipient notice would sure be nice too. Sending the Virus tag and notices when the message is over the size limit is a bit confusing to people.

Thanks,
-Alan

>At 17:17 28/08/2003, you wrote:
>>Julian,
>>
>> >I have just released 4.23-8.
>> >- Added 3 new options to allow fine-grained control of notifications to
>> >   senders, so that you can notify senders of bad filenames but not
>> >   viruses, for example. The 3 new settings are:
>> >   Notify Senders Of Blocked Filenames Or Filetypes
>> >   Notify Senders Of Other Blocked Content
>> >   Notify Senders Of Viruses
>>
>>Which of these does the rejection due to an oversized message size fall
>>under, any of them?
>
>Not a clue at the moment. I will try to find time to work that one out. It
>should be under "other blocked content" really shouldn't it.
>
>
>>When you added that feature for me back in release 4.22, messages that
>>were over the limit were tagged as a virus rather than their own category.
>>
>>As such, would setting any of those new options listed above result in a
>>no notification being sent to the sender when an oversized message was
>>rejected? Particularly setting 'Notify Senders Of Viruses' option? Being
>>able to stop sending virus notifications is nice, but I can't stop sending
>>notifications to those that have a message rejected due to it being over
>>the limit I set.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Alan
>
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support