Messages from Mailer-Daemon handled differently?

Paul zen23003 at ZEN.CO.UK
Tue Aug 26 12:36:44 IST 2003


Ta Kevin, that would explain it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Spicer, Kevin" <Kevin.Spicer at BMRB.CO.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Messages from Mailer-Daemon handled differently?


Probably the bounce included the original email as an attachment, the pif
file was therefore a component of the attached mime message, rather than an
attachment to the actual bounce message directly.
As far as I know filename rules are not applied to nested attachments.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list