Problems with inline warnings.

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Aug 20 14:51:04 IST 2003


At 13:01 20/08/2003, you wrote:
>Hi again
>
>here is the version no. of the perl packages.
>
>Btw. I use Mailscanner ver. 4.22-5
>
>
>
>dev-lang/perl           5.8.0-r12
>dev-perl/IO-stringy     2.108-r1
>dev-perl/MIME-Base64    2.20
>dev-perl/MailTools      1.58
>dev-perl/File-Spec      0.84-r1
>dev-perl/HTML-Tagset    3.03-r2
>dev-perl/HTML-Parser    3.30
>dev-perl/MIME-tools     5.411a-r2
>dev-perl/File-Temp      0.12
>dev-perl/Convert-TNEF   0.17-r2
>
>
>
>I have not applied the security-patches, since I thought that they were
>included in the new version of MIME-tools.

5.411 is not a "new version". It is the one I recommend, and (as my
instructions on the web site say quite clearly) it needs the security patches.




>Best Regards
>
>Michael
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
>Behalf Of Julian Field
>Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:54 PM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Re: Problems with inline warnings.
>
>
>At 03:10 20/08/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi m8s
> >
> >I just re-installed a server with Mailscanner, but now I have some smaller
> >problems (I hope)
> >
> >1)      Even though I've set "Warning is attachment" to no I get all
> >warnings as
> >a attachment.
>
>In which case you have a bug in your email app. The warnings are sent an
>"inline" MIME sections in this case and should be rendered with the main
>body text.
>
> >2)      Sometimes the Mailscanner "forgets" renaming the warning
>attachment.
> >         Ex:
> >                 I send a test.bat from a at mydomain.com to b at mydomain.com
> >
> >                 a at mydomain.com becomes the warningmessage that he has
> > sent a bad file -
> >good.
> >
> >                 b at mydomain.com gets the mail subject is {Filename?}..
> > WITH an attachment.
> >                 the attachment is named test.bat - but with the warning
> > as content...
> >weird.
> >
> >Any ideas?
>
>Not a clue on that one. Never seen it before.
>
>How did you install MailScanner? If you used the manual installation route
>did you successfully apply all 4 security patches to MIME-tools? Did you
>use the version of MIME-tools I recommend?
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list