dangerous html warning

[Peter Peters]

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:39:33 +0200, you wrote:

>> Currently the settings invoked by the various dangerous HTML settings
>> {?virus} text. Would anyone else be helped by a separate warning? I have had
>> several people say that they have scanned their computers and found nothing
>> and I have to explain that "If you read the attachment it says...".

I asked Julian a few months ago about Subject changes for dangerous
html. It would be a major rewrite of some code.

>> I wonder if a more appropriate warning like {?dangerous format} or something
>> much better might help.
>
>Same here, a lot of people send in mail like, your scanner sucks since my
>own scanner didnt find anything. They dont understand it was for example
>a reject based on filename filters.
>
>Would it be possible to have a seperate identifier for that ?
>Something like {?rejected} ?

For filenames there is allready:
|# If an attachment triggered a filename check, but there was nothing
|# else wrong with the message, do you want to modify the subject line?
|# This makes filtering in Outlook very easy.
|# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
|Filename Modify Subject = yes
|
|# This is the text to add to the start of the subject if the
|# "Filename Modify Subject" option is set.
|# You might want to change this so your users can see at a glance
|# whether it just was just the filename that MailScanner rejected.
|# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
|Filename Subject Text = {Filename?}

--
Peter Peters, senior netwerkbeheerder
Dienst Informatietechnologie, Bibliotheek en Educatie (ITBE)
Universiteit Twente,  Postbus 217,  7500 AE  Enschede
telefoon: 053 - 489 2301, fax: 053 - 489 2383, http://www.utwente.nl/civ