Which is better for use with MS? Sendmail, postfix, exim..... ..

[Julian Field]

At 19:29 05/08/2003, you wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
> >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:05 PM
> >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >Subject: Re: Which is better for use with MS? Sendmail, postfix,
> >exim.......
>
> >>> [ ...snip... ]
> >> [ ...snip... ]
> >
> >Out of sendmail, Exim and Postfix, Exim is the fastest too when used in
> >conjunction with MailScanner. I virtually always use Exim when
> >speed-testing.
> >
> >Postfix itself is fast, but due to its internal design causes
> >a lot more
> >I/O with MailScanner than sendmail or Exim.
> >
> >Sendmail can approach the speed of Exim, but I have yet to
> >make it beat it.
>
>Any thoughts on qmail?  Besides sendmail it's the only other mta on *nix
>I've run (so far).  Haven't attempted it with MS though.

Don't. It's not supported (yet). I don't like it much as it's "patch city"
of which I fundamentally disapprove.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support