FW: Striphtml VS attachment and related issues

[Ken Anderson]

It's always placed in an attachment. Browsers may display attachments
inline though, so it's not terribly effective.

With the new panic about the direct x midi vulnerability, maybe we need
to add:

deny    \.mid$          Possible directx/directshow attack

But that will break those awful greeting cards...

It would be nice if there was a "zip" option to the Spam Action.
Then you could do "deliver zip" for some spam?

Ken


Desai, Jason wrote:

> I prefer to have spam put in an attachment, even if it is not HTML.  Many
> non-HTML spams can still contain offensive text.
>
> Jason
>
>
>>Julian
>>
>>QUESTION: If you have "deliver attachment" set for spam, what
>>determines
>>when the message body of a tagged message is placed in an
>>attachment and
>>when it is not?
>
>
> [snip]
>
>