'Include Scanner Name In Reports' query...
Peter Bates
Peter.Bates at LSHTM.AC.UK
Fri Apr 25 10:19:46 IST 2003
Hello all...
I've got 'Include Scanner Name In Reports = yes' set in MailScanner.conf.
In the 'admin' message (i.e. message generated when virus is intercepted) I see:
The following e-mail messages were found to have viruses in them:
<snip snip>
MessageID: 2F18414A13B
Report: SophosSAVI:TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc was infected by WM97/Ethan
F-Prot: /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/27430/./2F18414A13B/TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc Infection: W97M/Ethan.A
McAfee: /2F18414A13B/TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc Found the W97M/Ethan.a virus !!!
... which I like.
However, in the message to the sender to warn them of their possible infection, I also see:
Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:-
<snip>
Report: SophosSAVI:TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc was infected by WM97/Ethan
F-Prot: TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc Infection: W97M/Ethan.A
McAfee: TMA FORM- Hsm(e) HS203.doc Found the W97M/Ethan.a virus !!!
It's just a pedantic point, and one that has been mentioned before, but is there a way of avoiding revealing the names of the AV scanners going out the senders? I think it was mentioned in the past with respect to people identifying which AV scanners are being used at a site... it always pays to be paranoid ;)
Is this possible, does it involve major Perl brain surgery, or is it not a feature people are particularly using?
Thanks...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
Peter Bates, Systems Support Officer, Network Support Team.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Telephone:0207-958 8353 / Fax: 0207- 636 9838
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list