ANNOUNCE: Version 4.14 released

[Daniel Tan]

sorry for posting OOT to mailscanner...

how do u do a proper install with spam assassin ? i am trying to install the
latest rpm

the command u asked me to type in still says 2.50
i tried rpm -i --nodeps spamassassin-2.53-1.8.0.i386.rpm
and this too - rpm -i --nodeps perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.53-1.8.0.i386.rpm

i tried rpm with -U and --force options but still cant get it upgraded

but after i type in your command..it still says 2.50 and even
spamassassin -V says it is 2.50
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Version 4.14 released


At 10:51 08/04/2003, you wrote:
>the reason why i am ugrading is due to the fact that spamassassin 2.50 has
>problems with mailscanner...
>it seems like doing spamassassin --version is still at 2.50...although i
>have already upgraded....now still to find out why it did not upgrade

But what did
perl -MMail::SpamAssassin -le 'print $Mail::SpamAssassin::VERSION;'
say?
That's checking the version of SpamAssassin you really have installed where
perl is looking for it, not just some version you happen to have unpacked
in another directory.


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <raymond at PROLOCATION.NET>
>To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 3:49 PM
>Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Version 4.14 released
>
>
>Hello Daniel,
>
> > how do you check the correct version of mailscanner and spam assassin?
> > just recently i upgraded spam assassin to the latest version to avoid
>mails
> > to be stuck due to mailscanner unable to send it out
> > but i still got the problem yesterday.that's why i need to check whether
>it
>
>For Spam Assasin:
>
>[root at master .spamassassin]# spamassassin --version
>SpamAssassin version 2.53
>
>For Mailscanner, it prints the version number also in your maillog when
>starting up, so have a look there.
>
> > hope it helps as the staff are gunning for my head coz their mails
aren't
> > sent "on time"
>
>Can you be a bit more specific ?
>
>Bye,
>Raymond.

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support