Version 4.00.0a4

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Sep 23 23:37:52 IST 2002


At 15:18 23/09/2002, you wrote:
>My original question was
>
> >>If "Use SpamAssassin = no" and "Load SpamAssassin = yes" in
>mailscanner.conf, it does try to use >>spamassasin. I would have expected
>the "Use SpamAssassin = no" to have precedence.

Afraid not. As the "Use" line can be a ruleset, I would have to cheat a bit
(which I haven't done yet) to be able to tell that it's just "no" and not a
ruleset which happens to produce the value "no" for a particular message.

Can see your point though, so it may change... :)


>The default in the file was
>
>Use SpamAssassin = yes
>Load SpamAssassin = yes
>
>So when the error message first appeared I just set
>
>Use SpamAssassin = no
>
>And expected it not to do anything with Spam Assassin, however the error
>continued untill
>
>Load SpamAssassin = no
>
>I know its a very simple problem and easy to just set both to no, and
>thinking about it now I imagine the default when you do a release will be
>no/no so the problem after someone first installs it, will not occur.

Right, okay, I see the problem now. I've changed the default in 4a5 to no
and no, instead of yes and yes.

>Im just used to the "master" switch of "Use SpamAssassin".

Sorry, that had to change due to the possibility of it being a ruleset. It
does mean that you can selectively switch SpamAssassin on and off for
particular addresses / domains.

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
>To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:56 PM
>Subject: Re: Version 4.00.0a4
>
>
> > At 14:43 23/09/2002, you wrote:
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >If I start with "Load SpamAssasin = yes" I get
> > >
> > >Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> > >/opt/MailScanner/bin /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0
> > >/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
> > >/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at MailScanner/SA.pm line 69
> >
> > Have you installed SpamAssassin? If not, then I would fully expect "Load
> > SpamAssassin=yes" to fail.
> >
> > >Also just noticed I got
> > >
> > >We haven't got any child processes, which isn't right!, No child
>processes
> > >at /opt/MailScanner/bin/mailscanner line 174.
> > >We have just tried to reap a process which wasn't one of ours!, No child
> > >processes at /opt/MailScanner/bin/mailscanner line 177.
> >
> > This is because it is aborting while trying to load SpamAssassin. If you
> > haven't got it installed, then clearly(?) you need to set "Load
> > SpamAssassin = no".
> >
> > >Seems fine if I set to "Load SpamAssasin = no"
> > >
> > >I dont have spamassasin installed.
> >
> > Aha! Don't tell it to load software you haven't got. Surprisingly enough
>it
> > fails :-)
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: <mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>Julian Field
> > >To: <mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > >Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:22 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Version 4.00.0a4
> > >
> > >At 12:49 23/09/2002, you wrote:
> > >>Just trying it out on a totally fresh server.
> > >>
> > >>Looks really good, comments are
> > >>
> > >>1. Sophos.install - does not point to the new location for
>sophos-wrapper
> > >>and sophos-autoupdate scripts.
> > >Fixed.
> > >
> > >>2. If "Use SpamAssassin = no" and "Load SpamAssassin = yes" in
> > >>mailscanner.conf, it does try to use spamassasin. I would have expected
> > >>the "Use SpamAssassin = no" to have precedence.
> > >Does it try to use it, or just try to load it?
> > >Working out whether "Use SpamAssassin" is yes or no is no longer easy
> > >because it could be a ruleset rather than a simple value. That's why I
>put
> > >in the "Load SpamAssassin" option in, as that has to be just yes or no.
> > >
> > >>Im very interested in the ability to do different signatures for
> > >>different domains, and will be trying that out next, I was looking at
>the
> > >>example and it seemed to apply for outgoing mail only e.g.
> > >>
> > >>    From:        <mailto:*@domain1.com>*@domain1.com
> > >> /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain1.sig.txt
> > >>    From:        <mailto:*@domain2.com>*@domain2.com
> > >> /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain2.sig.txt
> > >>
> > >>Does this work for for To: as well? e.g.
> > >>
> > >>     To:        <mailto:*@domain1.com>*@domain1.com
> > >> /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain1.sig.txt
> > >>     To:        <mailto:*@domain2.com>*@domain2.com
> > >> /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain2.sig.txt
> > >You can have "from", "to" or "fromto" or "tofrom" etc in the first field.
> > >It just looks at the first word for the word "from" and for the word "to"
> > >so if you want both then you can combine them how you like. So I would do
> > >         FromTo:         *@domain1.com
> > > /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain1.sig.txt
> > >         FromTo:         *@domain2.com
> > > /opt/MailScanner/etc/reports/domain2.sig.txt
> > >
> > >Don't forget to set the HTML sigs as well as the txt ones.
> > >--
> > >Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
> > >jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> > >Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
> > >                             Southampton SO17 1BJ
> > >--
> > >This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > >dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is
> > >believed to be clean.
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > >dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is
> > >believed to be clean.
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
> > jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> > Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
> >                              Southampton SO17 1BJ
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.

--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ



More information about the MailScanner mailing list