Second speed test

Mike Kercher mike at CAMAROSS.NET
Sun Sep 22 23:53:37 IST 2002


I did NOT remove the RPM of 3.22-14 because I wasn't sure if it would mess up any of the necessary perl modules that are installed
along with the RPM.  I haven't had any problems yet!


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:34 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Second speed test


> >When can we expect a RPM release?
>
> When I'm quite happy that it works as well as I can get it to. Still
> finding bugs at the moment.
> I have to assume that people needing an rpm aren't as experienced as those
> who don't. Fault-finding comes with experience, so I only want the
> most-experienced people to be trying it now.
>
> Hope you understand, it's for your benefit (and that of your customers
> too). I hope I'm not being seen as condescending in any way, I'm just
> trying to protect everyone involved.

I agree but am waiting patiently for all the new bells and whistles.  I have
installed applications such as MRTG without an RPM but if all it takes is a
week or so of patiance, I'll wait.  RPM's also have an uninstall option as
well I beleive.  Should the version 3 Mailscanner rpm be removed before
version 4 goes in?

Matt



More information about the MailScanner mailing list