"Greetings"

[Julian Field]

At 17:06 25/10/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Julian Field wrote:
> > Would people prefer
> > 1) Replace the content of messages containing "nasty" headers such as this,
> > as if it was a virus
> > 2) Just flag is as spam and handle according to the normal "Spam Actions"
> > ?
> >
> > I'm writing (1) at the moment, but it just occurred to me that (2) might be
> > better.
> >
> > Your votes please...
>
>This is mere speculation and may be impractical, but...
>
>How about making the behaviour (currently a proposed two-list of
>"virus-like" or "spam-like") somehow selectable by the sys.admin.??

How did I know that someone was about to say that...
:-)

I'm going to go with the SpamAssassin solution for now, it means less work
for me and I've had a long week. More brandy needed....
--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ