new versions - nevermind

Kris Stumpner kris at JUMPOUT.ORG
Fri Oct 11 02:34:38 IST 2002


nevermind.  I was on the wrong terminal when i looked at that.  Oops.

Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Kris Stumpner
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:33 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [MAILSCANNER] new versions


the issue seems to have been resolved in 4.00.0a13-1

Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Mike Kercher
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:46 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [MAILSCANNER] new versions


Dang...getting the same thing here with 4.00.0a11-1

[root at redline etc]# Content Checks: Need to convert HTML to plain text
in 1 messages at MailScanner/SweepContent.pm line 145
Content Checks: Need to convert HTML to plain text in 1 messages at
MailScanner/SweepContent.pm line 145
Content Checks: Need to convert HTML to plain text in 1 messages at
MailScanner/SweepContent.pm line 145


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
Behalf Of Kris Stumpner
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:52 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: new versions


Recieved the following on the console with 4.00.0a12-1

[root at formula rules]# Content Checks: Need to convert HTML to plain text
in 1 messages at MailScanner/SweepContent.pm line 145 Content Checks:
Detected and will convert HTML message to plain text in g9AMbg522660 at
MailScanner/Message.pm line 1834

still working on testing the rest.

Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]On
Behalf Of Julian Field
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:46 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [MAILSCANNER] new versions


At 22:17 10/10/2002, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
> > Before I announce them properly, is there any chance someone could
> > try
them
> > out for me please?
> >
> > They appear to work okay for me, but I would appreciate a third
> > party report before announcing them (particularly the V3 release).
>
>Whats changed, what should we look (test) for ?

Check what happens if you allow/ban iframe tags, to see whether you get
the inline warning and the replaced attachment where you should. Check
the MIME parsing basically works okay. This one should be obvious if
it's wrong. See what reporting you get for Bugbear infections. You
should get a replacement for the entire message that contains about 3
different reports (iframe warning, virus warning and filename warning).
--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ



More information about the MailScanner mailing list