Is Redhat 8.0 Compatible?
Jim Levie
jim at ENTROPHY-FREE.NET
Tue Oct 1 21:02:09 IST 2002
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 11:15, Julian Field wrote:
> At 16:56 01/10/2002, you wrote:
> >On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 10:46, Julian Field wrote:
> > > At 16:23 01/10/2002, you wrote:
> > > >I noticed that the new release of Redhat comes with Perl 5.8 and the
> > > >latest version of sendmail. Will there be compatibility problems using
> > > >MailScanner and SpamAssassin with this release?
> > >
> > > Once I have managed to get hold of a copy of RedHat 8, I will try it out.
> > > It will take me a couple of days...
> > > --
> >I should be able to tell you if there's a problem with either the V3 or
> >V4 code by this evening. I have almost every thing set up to be able to
> >test both versions against 8.0 right now.
>
The first batch of results are in. The first test is against 3.23-4
w/SpamAssassin-2.41 & Sophos. DNS checks are off in SpamAssassin, but on
for ORDB-RBL & MAPS-RSS+. I'm on the same hardware that I've run my test
set before and the speed seems equivalent to when the OS was RH 7.3. As
far as I can tell without deploying to a live server everything appears
to be normal.
I'll try 4.00.0a7 later today.
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
The instructions said to use Windows 98 or better, so I installed RedHat
Jim Levie email:
jim at entrophy-free.net
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list