good version of SpamAssassin?

[Matt Kettler]

Agreed, aside from adjusting the SpamAssassin timeouts (look for my prior
posting on that in this list just yesterday or the day before) I'm running
SpamaAsassin 2.43 under MailScanner 3.24-1 without any problems.

I personally also have the AWL disabled, but the 2.43 version doesn't have
any significant AWL issues I'm aware of. I just feel that the AWL is a Bad
Idea when applied as a single global database like MailScanner winds up
doing. Lots of people use it this way without issues, but I see it as a
serious minefield fraught with dangers.

At 05:20 PM 11/1/2002 +0000, Julian Field wrote:
>At 17:17 01/11/2002, you wrote:
>>I vaguely remember there being some problem with a certain version of SA. Was
>>I imagining this? I am about to go from 2.31 to 2.43 and wanted to ensure I
>>wasn't buggering something up.
>
>2.40, 2.41 and 2.42 were trouble. 2.43 is fine.
>--
>Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
>jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
>Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
>                             Southampton SO17 1BJ