good version of SpamAssassin?

Matt Kettler mkettler at EVI-INC.COM
Fri Nov 1 18:49:43 GMT 2002

Agreed, aside from adjusting the SpamAssassin timeouts (look for my prior
posting on that in this list just yesterday or the day before) I'm running
SpamaAsassin 2.43 under MailScanner 3.24-1 without any problems.

I personally also have the AWL disabled, but the 2.43 version doesn't have
any significant AWL issues I'm aware of. I just feel that the AWL is a Bad
Idea when applied as a single global database like MailScanner winds up
doing. Lots of people use it this way without issues, but I see it as a
serious minefield fraught with dangers.

At 05:20 PM 11/1/2002 +0000, Julian Field wrote:
>At 17:17 01/11/2002, you wrote:
>>I vaguely remember there being some problem with a certain version of SA. Was
>>I imagining this? I am about to go from 2.31 to 2.43 and wanted to ensure I
>>wasn't buggering something up.
>2.40, 2.41 and 2.42 were trouble. 2.43 is fine.
>Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
>jkf at         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
>Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
>                             Southampton SO17 1BJ

More information about the MailScanner mailing list