{SPAM?} Re: Virus report e-mail

[David Sullivan]

On 30 Jun 2002 at 16:58, Julian Field wrote:

> At 16:23 30/06/2002, you wrote:
> >I was just testing some config options, namely adding  the RFC-IGNORANT
> >checks and this messaged got marked spam with just
> >RFC-IGNORANT-WHOIS in the X-MailScanner-SpamCheck field ,
> >
> >which suggests it might be a too sensitive test.
>
> I personally don't use any of the rfc-ignorant tests at all.

One good reason not to is that .uk is listed, that'll be why rfc-ignorant flagged it.

David
==============================================================
This communication may contain privileged or confidential information which
is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you may not distribute or use this
communication or the information it contains.  If this e-mail has reached you
in error, please delete it and any attachment.

Internet communications are not secure and Barnet College does not accept
legal responsibility for the content of this message.  Any views or opinions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Barnet College.

Please note that Barnet College reserves the right to monitor the
source/destinations of all incoming or outgoing e-mail communications.
==============================================================