False positive - SA 2.30
Julian Field
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sun Jun 16 12:58:17 IST 2002
Please try applying the attached patch to sendmail.pl and see if it solves
the problem. Something really subtle is going wrong, it looks as if 1 "if"
statement is not behaving as expected in the SA code, so I've rewritten my
end of it a bit.
Please let me know if this fixes the problem. If so, I'll roll it into a
"-4" release.
At 07:58 16/06/2002, you wrote:
>This is the first time I've ever had one of these. I installed
>MailScanner 3.20-3 and SpamAssassin 2.30 yesterday afternoon and
>received this yesterday evening:
>
>>Return-Path: <orange-admin at listman.net>
>>Received: from i.overslept.net (unallocated.star.net.uk
>>[62.231.139.252] (may be forged)) by mallard.zanker.org
>>(8.11.6/8.11.6-MZ) with ESMTP id g5FLjs201388; Sat, 15 Jun 2002
>>22:45:54 +0100
>>Received: from i.overslept.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>> by i.overslept.net (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id g5FLi2I07247;
>> Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:44:03 +0100
>>Received: from ultra2.uk2net.com (ultra2.uk2net.com [212.4.208.102])
>> by i.overslept.net (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id g5FLhSI07225
>> for <orange at i.overslept.net>; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:43:28 +0100
>>Received: from technetium.cix.co.uk ([194.153.0.53])
>> by ultra2.uk2net.com with esmtp (Exim 0.00)
>> id 17JLKP-0002Ot-00
>> for orange at listman.net; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:43:25 +0100
>>Received: (from cix at localhost)
>> by technetium.cix.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g5FLhRL20376
>> for orange at listman.net; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:43:27 +0100 (BST)
>>X-Envelope-From: jonmorris at cix.compulink.co.uk
>>From: jonmorris at cix.compulink.co.uk (Jonathan Morris)
>>Subject: {SPAM?} Re: [ORANGE] Orange roaming in Sweden..
>>To: orange at listman.net
>>Reply-To: jonmorris at cix.compulink.co.uk
>>Message-Id: <memo.283056 at cix.compulink.co.uk>
>>X-Ameol-Version: 2.52.2000, Windows 98 4.90.3000 ( )
>>Sender: orange-admin at listman.net
>>Errors-To: orange-admin at listman.net
>>X-BeenThere: orange at listman.net
>>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
>>Precedence: bulk
>>List-Help: <mailto:orange-request at listman.net?subject=help>
>>List-Post: <mailto:orange at listman.net>
>>List-Subscribe: <http://i.overslept.net/mailman/listinfo/orange>,
>> <mailto:orange-request at listman.net?subject=subscribe>
>>List-Id: Users of the Orange mobile network <orange.listman.net>
>>List-Unsubscribe: <http://i.overslept.net/mailman/listinfo/orange>,
>> <mailto:orange-request at listman.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>>List-Archive: <http://i.overslept.net/pipermail/orange/>
>>X-Original-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:43 +0100 (BST)
>>Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:43 +0100 (BST)
>>X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>>X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: SpamAssassin (score=1.6, required 5,
>>MAY_BE_FORGED)
>
>I have
>
>Always Include SpamAssassin Report = no
>
>and
>
>Compile SpamAssassin Once = yes
>
>which I see mentions the possibility of false positives. Could this be
>one of those cases?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mike
>--
>Mike Zanker
>Northampton, UK
>PGP Public Key: pgp at zanker.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sendmail.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1402 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20020616/f27b2898/sendmail.obj
-------------- next part --------------
--
Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list