spamassassin (spamd)

Julian Field jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Jan 28 10:38:23 GMT 2002


At 22:07 27/01/2002, you wrote:
>It's quite a bit faster than calling the SpamAssassin perl script every
>time to check e-mails.  Now that MailScanner has SA support, is there a
>way to get MailScanner to use spamc instead of the spamassassin perl
>script?  Right now, I've disabled SA support in MailScanner and am using
>spamc separately with procmail; however, I'd like to enable SA support
>in MailScanner.  Any ideas?

MailScanner doesn't call the "spamassassin" perl script, or indeed the
spamc/spamd stuff.

It uses the Perl API directly into SpamAssassin, and so doesn't have to
invoke anything, which is faster than either of the methods you list above.
--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ



More information about the MailScanner mailing list