spamassassin (spamd)
Julian Field
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Jan 28 10:38:23 GMT 2002
At 22:07 27/01/2002, you wrote:
>It's quite a bit faster than calling the SpamAssassin perl script every
>time to check e-mails. Now that MailScanner has SA support, is there a
>way to get MailScanner to use spamc instead of the spamassassin perl
>script? Right now, I've disabled SA support in MailScanner and am using
>spamc separately with procmail; however, I'd like to enable SA support
>in MailScanner. Any ideas?
MailScanner doesn't call the "spamassassin" perl script, or indeed the
spamc/spamd stuff.
It uses the Perl API directly into SpamAssassin, and so doesn't have to
invoke anything, which is faster than either of the methods you list above.
--
Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list