SpamAssassin 2.0 - beware of old spamassassin.cf file!

[Matt Kaminer]

Loyal users of Mailscanner:

Which works better with Mailscanner, RBL or SpamAssassin?  Im still trying
to decide which one to use with Mailscanner.

One con for RBL is that you have to pay for it now :-(  ORBS aint cutting
it.  It only catches about 60-70 percent of the SPAM.

-Matt

Julian Field said:
> At 08:09 25/01/2002, you wrote:
>>Please read the list archives on this subject.  I get about a 70% hit
>>rate on spams when running through mailscanner, much higher when
>>running spamassassin on the command line.  Some messages aren't being
>>recognized when run through mailscanner.
>
> Please note this is due to SpamAssassin bugs, not MailScanner bugs :-)
> I call their API just the way they told me to...
> --
> Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
> jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
>                             Southampton SO17 1BJ