Rejected posting to MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
L-Soft list server at JISCMAIL (1.8d)
LISTSERV at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Thu Feb 28 20:52:15 GMT 2002
Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it appears to have
already been distributed to the MAILSCANNER list. That is, a message with
identical text (but possibly with different mail headers) has been posted to
the list recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good reason
to resend this message to the list (for instance because you have been notified
of a hardware failure with loss of data), please alter the text of the message
in some way and resend it to the list. Note that altering the "Subject:" line
or adding blank lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient;
you should instead add a sentence or two at the top explaining why you are
resending the message, so that the other subscribers understand why they are
getting two copies of the same message.
------------------------ Rejected message (70 lines) --------------------------
Return-Path: <JKF at HAWK.ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
Received: from ori.rl.ac.uk by jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <2.000CD931 at jiscmail.ac.uk>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:52:15 +0000
Received: from med.core01.med.wayne.edu (med-core01.med.wayne.edu [146.9.19.198])
by ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g1SKqEE25591
for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:52:14 GMT
Received: from mail pickup service by med.core01.med.wayne.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:51:57 -0500
Received: from eeyore.med.wayne.edu ([146.9.19.19]) by med.core01.med.wayne.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453);
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:41:39 -0500
Received: from med.core01.med.wayne.edu ([146.9.19.198])
by eeyore.med.wayne.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g1SGTmXA012678
for <brose at med.wayne.edu>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:29:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eeyore.med.wayne.edu ([146.9.19.19]) by med.core01.med.wayne.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453);
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:33:52 -0500
Received: from jiscmail.ac.uk (jiscmail.ac.uk [130.246.192.48])
by eeyore.med.wayne.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g1SDwUWx019428
for <brose at MED.WAYNE.EDU>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:58:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from jiscmail (jiscmail.ac.uk) by jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.000CD63B at jiscmail.ac.uk>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:03:23 +0000
Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d)
with spool id 10113447 for MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK; Thu, 28 Feb
2002 14:03:23 +0000
Received: from ori.rl.ac.uk by jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with
SMTP id <1.000CD516 at jiscmail.ac.uk>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:03:21 +0000
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.70.1]) by
ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g1SE3LE15576 for
<MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:03:21 GMT
Received: from hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk (hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.142]) by
raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28947 for
<MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:03:19 GMT
Received: from tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk (tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.69.139])
by hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08332 for
<MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:03:18 GMT
X-Sender: jkf at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020228140132.05b3a630 at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:01:47 +0000
Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sender: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
From: Julian Field <jkf at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: logging noise
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
In-Reply-To: <v04220803b8a367aeebda@[192.168.1.149]>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2002 16:33:53.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[B56A6540:01C1C075]
At 05:00 28/02/2002, you wrote:
>I noticed mailscanner likes to send log messages...
>
>I don't really need to see all the "about to..." and "going to..."
>messages. Shouldn't these be at the debug level?
Agreed. I'll change this a bit.
>I started poking around in the source to see if I just had my logging
>level set to low. Looks like they are logged at the same "info" level
>as all the spam and virus information.
>
>~Todd
>
>P.S. Thanks for a great tool Julian.
Glad you like it!
--
Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list