Duplicate messages on list (was: Reg. cost-free antivirus products)
David Lancaster
dml at UNB.CA
Wed Dec 11 13:05:47 GMT 2002
Looks like messages are getting reposted to the list. I've gotten a number
of messages twice, with a delay of almost a day before the second post.
Looks like it's being received and resent by nottinghamcity.gov.uk...
Received: from [194.72.158.100] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by relay1.bt.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18M2eg-00010f-00 for
MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:55:46 +0000
Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (unverified) by cohen (Content
Technologies
SMTPRS 4.3.1) with SMTP id <T5f15bbfb0cc0a80102408 at cohen> for
<Richard.Heggs at nottinghamcity.gov.uk>; Tue,
10 Dec 2002 16:42:14 +0000
Julian, can you unsubcribe "Richard.Heggs at nottinghamcity.gov.uk" until
they get "mail.nottinghamcity.gov.uk" fixed up?
I'd almost say that "Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.1" is using the Body
"To:" field instead of the envelope...heh.
Cheers,
D.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Julian Field wrote:
> At 16:45 10/12/2002, you wrote:
> >I'm going to install another box with MailScanner.
> >Ussually I use McAfee as virusengine, but now I want to try some of
> >those free anitivus products ;)
> >But... before I start installing it, I wanna know if you guys have some
> >experience(s) with those products?
>
> The only really free one is ClamAV.
> You can use F-Prot for personal use for no money as well, but they want
> cash if it's not just for personal use.
>
> >Do they update virus-def. files as often as e.g. McAfee?
> >Which cost-free product would you prefer?
> >Hope to hear from you soon.
>
> >Thank you Julian, for a REALY nice work.
>
> No problem!
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses
> ********************************************************************************************************************************************
>
===========================================================
David Lancaster
ITS ESS
447-3212
-------------- next part --------------
From mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk Wed Dec 11 08:50:41 2002
Received: from hermes.csd.unb.ca (root at hermes [131.202.3.20])
by sol.sun.csd.unb.ca (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gBAGlaK04352
for <dml at sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:47:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailserv2 (mailserv.unb.ca [131.202.3.23])
by hermes.csd.unb.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id gBAGlXAV005058
for <dml at unb.ca>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:47:34 -0400 (AST)
Received: FROM spamfilter.csd.unb.ca BY mailserv2 ; Tue Dec 10 12:47:31
2002 -0400
Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk [130.246.192.48])
by spamfilter.csd.unb.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBAGlK218311
for <dml at UNB.CA>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:47:20 -0400
Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<0.0020B4FB at smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:18 +0000
Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
1.8e)
with spool id 16317585 for MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK; Tue, 10 Dec
2002 16:47:18 +0000
Received: from 130.246.192.52 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0f) with
TCP;
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:18 GMT
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.70.1])
by
ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBAGlGa31263 for
<MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:17 GMT
Received: from roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk
[152.78.68.161]) by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id
QAA27928 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:16
GMT
Received: from tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk (tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk
[152.78.69.139])
by roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
gBAGlCKe025209 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002
16:47:13 GMT
X-Sender: (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20021210164320.06b8e8e0 at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:44:20 +0000
Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sender: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk>
From: Julian Field <mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Reg. cost-free antivirus products
To: MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <200212101645.gBAGj8211465 at ns1.computopic.dk>
Precedence: list
X-UNB-SpamScanner: Scanned
X-UNB-SpamResult: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.4, required 7,
IN_REP_TO ())
Content-Length: 724
At 16:45 10/12/2002, you wrote:
>I'm going to install another box with MailScanner.
>Ussually I use McAfee as virusengine, but now I want to try some of
>those free anitivus products ;)
>But... before I start installing it, I wanna know if you guys have some
>experience(s) with those products?
The only really free one is ClamAV.
You can use F-Prot for personal use for no money as well, but they want
cash if it's not just for personal use.
>Do they update virus-def. files as often as e.g. McAfee?
>Which cost-free product would you prefer?
>Hope to hear from you soon.
>Thank you Julian, for a REALY nice work.
No problem!
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
-------------- next part --------------
From mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk Wed Dec 11 08:50:23 2002
Received: from hermes.csd.unb.ca (root at hermes [131.202.3.20])
by sol.sun.csd.unb.ca (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gBB8tvK14078
for <dml at sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 04:55:57 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailserv2 (mailserv.unb.ca [131.202.3.23])
by hermes.csd.unb.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id gBB8trAV029041
for <dml at unb.ca>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 04:55:54 -0400 (AST)
Received: FROM spamfilter.csd.unb.ca BY mailserv2 ; Wed Dec 11 04:55:52
2002 -0400
Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk [130.246.192.48])
by spamfilter.csd.unb.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBB8tn229341
for <dml at UNB.CA>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 04:55:49 -0400
Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<6.00145669 at smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 8:55:47 +0000
Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
1.8e)
with spool id 16332796 for MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK; Wed, 11 Dec
2002 08:55:47 +0000
Received: from 130.246.192.52 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0f) with
TCP;
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:55:47 GMT
Received: from relay1.bt.net (relay1.bt.net [194.72.6.100]) by ori.rl.ac.uk
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBB8tka17963 for
<MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:55:46 GMT
Received: from [194.72.158.100] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by relay1.bt.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18M2eg-00010f-00 for
MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:55:46 +0000
Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (unverified) by cohen (Content
Technologies
SMTPRS 4.3.1) with SMTP id <T5f15bbfb0cc0a80102408 at cohen> for
<Richard.Heggs at nottinghamcity.gov.uk>; Tue,
10 Dec 2002 16:42:14 +0000
Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<0.0020B4FB at smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:18 +0000
Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
1.8e)
with spool id 16317585 for MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK; Tue, 10 Dec
2002 16:47:18 +0000
Received: from 130.246.192.52 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0f) with
TCP ;
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:18 GMT
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.70.1])
by
ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBAGlGa31263 for
<MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:17 GMT
Received: from roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk
[152.78.68.161]) by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id
QAA27928 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:47:16
GMT
Received: from tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk (tailor.ecs.soton.ac.uk
[152.78.69.139])
by roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
gBAGlCKe025209 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002
16:47:13 GMT
X-Sender: (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Precedence: list
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20021210164320.06b8e8e0 at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:44:20 +0000
Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sender: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk>
From: Julian Field <mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Reg. cost-free antivirus products
To: MAILSCANNER at jiscmail.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <200212101645.gBAGj8211465 at ns1.computopic.dk>
X-UNB-SpamScanner: Scanned
X-UNB-SpamResult: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.4, required 7,
IN_REP_TO ())
Content-Length: 986
At 16:45 10/12/2002, you wrote:
>I'm going to install another box with MailScanner.
>Ussually I use McAfee as virusengine, but now I want to try some of
>those free anitivus products ;)
>But... before I start installing it, I wanna know if you guys have some
>experience(s) with those products?
The only really free one is ClamAV.
You can use F-Prot for personal use for no money as well, but they want
cash if it's not just for personal use.
>Do they update virus-def. files as often as e.g. McAfee?
>Which cost-free product would you prefer?
>Hope to hear from you soon.
>Thank you Julian, for a REALY nice work.
No problem!
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses
********************************************************************************************************************************************
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list