4.10-1: Cannot create + lock headers file ...

[Julian Field]

At 10:03 06/12/2002, you wrote:
>Why have your naming conventions (MailScanner <-> mailscanner, PID
>directory choice, etc) diverged so much between the RPM and non-RPM
>tarballs of 4.10-1?

Due to lousy QA procedures on my part :-(
I will cross-check them all for 4.11 and try to do a better job.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Quentin Campbell [mailto:Q.G.Campbell at newcastle.ac.uk]
> > Sent: 06 December 2002 07:39
> > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: Re: 4.10-1: Cannot create + lock headers file ...
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk]
> > > Sent: 05 December 2002 17:41
> > > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > Subject: Re: 4.10-1: Cannot create + lock headers file ...
> > >
> > >
> > > The hazard with the init script (non RPM version) is that
> > > there are at least as many different ways of writing it as
> > > there are operating systems, I can't write a general one.
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > But I _am_ using the RPM init script. The rest of MS 4.10-1
> > is built from the non-RPM tar ball but I extracted the init
> > script from the RPM tarball and am using that. The only mod I
> > make is to the pathname for the "check_MailScanner" script to
> > pick up the Linux version from /opt/MailScanner/bin.
> >
> > Quentin
> > ---
> > PHONE: +44 191 222 8209    Computing Service, University of Newcastle
> > FAX:   +44 191 222 8765    Newcastle upon Tyne, United
> > Kingdom, NE1 7RU.
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > "Any opinion expressed above is mine. The University can get
> > its own."
> >

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support