Virus whitelist option?

[Julian Field]

Another aim for the next version is user and/or domain level control of the
"Virus Scanning" switch, so you will be able to do this.

At 16:22 23/08/2002, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hello all,
>
>I'm using mailscanner with great ease and really love it. (99% of the
>users also ;-)) but, some users are subscribed to mailinglist like bugtraq
>etc.
>
>The securityfocus.com domain is in the spam whitelist, but every now and
>then mailscanner rejects some emails because an scanner reports it
>contains and exploit/virus/trojan etc.
>
>I was wondering if there is a general intrest to create an whitelist
>option that will bypass both spam AND virus checking for some source
>and/or destination addresses.
>
>- From my perspective (small userbase) i would seem most ideal to exclude
>based on both sender and receiver address i.e:
>
>From: *@securityfocus.com && To: sjcjonker at sjc.nl
>
>What's the general opinion in this regards?
>
>- --
>Met Vriendelijke groet/Yours Sincerely
>Stijn Jonker <SJCJonker at sjc.nl>
>
>- --
>Outlook Express is actually an incredibly effective virus distribution
>system which only pretends to be an email program.
>[by Eric Lee]
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>iD8DBQE9ZlNDH0P/oLuWBrcRAh3lAJ9V1/mscoDe2k8uHi4ePt/UUhNIugCbB4cy
>IK2ZFnqtIXXPTThGpZZp2C0=
>=wki1
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ